The Daily Broadside

Thursday

Posted on 03/30/2023 5.00 AM

JCM 3/25/2023 7:33:57 PM


Posted by: JCM

Kosh's Shadow 3/29/2023 4:38:22 PM
1

Repost from Wednesday night so people will see it:

In #11 JCM said: So much for the concept of AI. It's just a lot of fancy programming.

Actually, AI results are not programmed as we know it.

What AI, Machine Learning in particular is, is a large set of functions with a lot of parameters, fed with data and desired outputs (a "training set"). The Machine Learning algorithm uses some method to adjust the parameters to minimize the error between the desired outputs and the training set's correct answers. This is usually a stochastic (random) method where adjustments are made to parameters and then continuing adjustments that minimize the error.

There are several problems with this approach. It is easy for an algorithm to approach a "local minimum" - reducing the error for some cases, but not for all. The result is usually validated with other data, and re-run with adjustments if it is bad.

But without any concept of what it is really doing, it is easy for an AI system to come up with similar outputs for what people who understand the world consider quite different. 

However, we could easily replace our current VP with any ML system.

CyberSimian 3/30/2023 5:15:46 AM
2

Reply to Kosh's Shadow in 1:

Garbage in, garbage out

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 5:19:59 AM
3
Good morning.  What are youses’ thoughts about the political crisis in Israel right now?
vxbush 3/30/2023 6:58:58 AM
4


In #3 Occasional Reader said: Good morning.  What are youses’ thoughts about the political crisis in Israel right now?

I'd have to know what it is. I am way behind on reading news. 

buzzsawmonkey 3/30/2023 8:31:27 AM
5

Reply to Occasional Reader in 3:

I don't know the details of the controversy, but I've heard for years that Israel's supreme court is a) extremely Leftist, and b) self-perpetuating, in that it chooses its own successors rather than the judges being chosen by the Knesset.  There have been efforts for years---unsuccessful---to re-structure this, as the court has spent a great deal of time thwarting the efforts of the more-conservative governments that Israel has intermittently elected.  

According to the New York Sun, from which I get a sometimes-readable-without-paywall feed, the Biden administration is attempting to foment/underwrite a "color revolution" against the Netanyahu government to thwart his efforts to change this and, if possible, unseat him.  It is my understanding that Biden recently announced that he would not meet with Netanyahu or receive him at the White House (so much for Netanyahu's effort to make nice with Biden by congratulating him on his election early on).   The following Sun editorial, which I was able to copy from the email feed, might possibly shed some light on the situation:

The most shocking thing about the crisis in Israel is the role of President Biden and his allies in the derailment of the court reform that Prime Minister Netanyahu just postponed. All like to boast of Israel being the Middle East’s only real democracy. No sooner does it finally give a full term to Mr. Netanyahu — partly for his promise to reform Israel’s high court — than Mr. Biden objects because he despises Mr. Netanyahu politically.

Not, just to mark the point, because Mr. Biden opposes the court reform. No one would accept in America a judiciary or attorney general with the powers usurped by those institutions in Israel. The Jewish state’s high court has accrued a veto on who is named to it. Imagine how Mr. Biden would react were we to give, say, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas the power to pick the next Supreme Court justices.

The conservative Knesset, as we’ve noted, wants to strip the attorney general and courts of the power to remove the Prime Minister. Yet neither America’s attorney general nor its courts have the power to remove the head of our government. No, the only way to do that, absent a medical crisis, is impeachment. If the attorney general could remove a president, the Democrats would come down with an epic case of the fantods.

The New York Sun supports the reforms Mr. Netanyahu is pursuing in respect of the courts. If Mr. Biden doesn’t support them, the question is why not? And why, in any event, does Mr. Biden insist on interfering in Israel’s internal politics? Mr. Biden certainly gets upset when Mr. Netanyahu interferes in our politics. When the premier spoke in 2015 to a joint meeting of Congress, Mr. Biden actually boycotted it.

As Israel’s internal debate spilled into the streets, Mr. Biden did the political equivalent of pouring gasoline on a fire — declaring himself  “deeply concerned” and siding with opponents of legislation designed to make Israel’s attorney general’s office and its judiciary more like America’s. That, in our view, is a matter to be decided by not American politicians and op-ed writers but by citizens of Israel. 

President Biden’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. On the one hand, he puts out a statement in the middle of this crisis “to strongly urge Israeli leaders to find a compromise as soon as possible.” This from the president who is refusing to compromise on, say, America’s legislated debt ceiling and who, having pledged a return to normalcy, has delivered the most bitterly divided electorate since the Civil War.

Which brings us back to Mr. Netanyahu. The striking thing about his performance in this crisis is the very thing that may account for his being elected Prime Minister an astonishing six times. It is his ability to compromise. The only other such figure prepared to adjust his position seems to be the opposition’s  Benny Gantz. Mr. Netanyahu cited him before the Knesset today. In this sense, Mr. Netanyahu reminds us of Churchill.

It was Churchill who said this is not the beginning of the end but the end of the beginning. What lies ahead is a test of whether those who are behind the anti-government protests — and the threats not to show up even for military obligations — are themselves prepared to compromise. That will be the true test of Israel’s democracy, which faces so many challenges. The last thing it needs is President Biden’s meddling.


Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 8:33:02 AM
6

Reply to vxbush in 4:

Wiki explainer. 

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 8:38:03 AM
7

Reply to buzzsawmonkey in 5:

Good stuff, thank you. 

NPR has been foursquare against the proposed reforms, of course; which gives me the default position of supporting them.  And certain the idea of  supreme court judges choosing their own successors, and an AG who can remove a head of state, is... weird, and I had not known they were features of the Israeli parliamentary order. 

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 8:54:48 AM
8


In #7 Occasional Reader said: And certain

...-ly

vxbush 3/30/2023 9:35:50 AM
9


In #7 Occasional Reader said: Reply to buzzsawmonkey in 5: Good stuff, thank you. 

Very good. Thanks, buzz. That is a *very* odd setup, to be sure. 

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 2:13:28 PM
10

waiting for the BREAK of DAYYYY  [trumpet flourish]


/just have the sound in my mind now, what a good rocker

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 2:28:47 PM
11
If (as the Progs sometimes claim to believe) the 2nd amendment only protects the right to keep and bear 224 year-old firearms, do those "penumbras and emanations" only protect the "right" to kill 224 year-old fetuses?
JCM 3/30/2023 2:48:15 PM
12

Reply to Occasional Reader in 11:

The the 1st A does not apply to radio, TV, or the internet.

Only to printed press and words spoken in the physical presence of an audience.

Occasional Reader 3/30/2023 3:14:42 PM
13
Trump indicted. 
JCM 3/30/2023 3:16:35 PM
14

I'm laughing at the guy on Linkend, he posted something he "invented" an Arduino board, and two stepper motors to draw and write on a whiteboard. 

I did not comment on his post.... "Yeah, it's called a plotter."

buzzsawmonkey 3/30/2023 3:21:40 PM
15


In #12 JCM said: The the 1st A does not apply to radio, TV, or the internet. Only to printed press and words spoken in the physical presence of an audience.

I've said before that the next time some Leftist talks about "banning high-capacity magazines," they should be told, "OK---let's start with the Atlantic, the New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, etc."


You must be logged in to comment.