vxbush 1/11/2023 6:40:48 AM

1

vxbush 1/11/2023 6:41:40 AM

2

vxbush 1/11/2023 6:44:14 AM

3

vxbush 1/11/2023 6:57:46 AM

4

COVID research to note:

Way too long to go over in depth, but this Substack author has put together a list of rules, laws, and government offices that directed the COVID response and how. I have no idea how accurate her one- or two-line summary of each code/rule/law is and how accurately it resulted in the COVID response we saw. So there's a dinosaur turd-sized piece of salt I'm presenting along with this information. I simply found this and found it noteworthy; I thought I'd share it. At the end, she posits the following:

Main Premise

Use of EUA-covered medical countermeasure (MCM) products including masks, PCR tests, mRNA and DNA injections, and other drugs, devices and biologics, once designated as such by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (March 10, 2020, retroactive to February 4, 2020) “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.” 21 USC 360bbb-3(k). FDA EUA law, adopted 1997 and amended 2003, 2004, 2005, 2013, 2017.

This is true no matter how untested, unmonitored, unsafe, or ineffective they are, no matter whether their harmfulness to human health and uselessness for infection-control are known before use, or discovered afterward. 

This premise she posits at the end implies (if accurate) that the action the governments took during COVID did not have to be good medical practice or really any medical intervention at all, if I'm understanding this right--and there was absolutely no need for that intervention to result in good health or improvement in health. 

Conspiracy theory? Yeah, I'm starting to feel better about conspiracy theories lately. 

JCM 1/11/2023 8:01:08 AM

5

Reply to vxbush in 4:

A key indicator among many for me was the ivermectin BS. Before covid ivermectin was a approved anti-viral one of just a few. Suddenly it was a horse deworming drug, that is an other use. The only thing I can figure is the manufacturer was on the take with Fauci et. all. 

vxbush 1/11/2023 8:12:34 AM

6

In #5 JCM said: A key indicator among many for me was the ivermectin BS. Before covid ivermectin was a approved anti-viral one of just a few. Suddenly it was a horse deworming drug, that is an other use. The only thing I can figure is the manufacturer was on the take with Fauci et. all. 

Was it ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine that got passed out to the members of Congress (and possibly many others in government) but not to anyone else? 

JCM 1/11/2023 8:15:50 AM

7

Reply to vxbush in 6:

IIRC the hydroxychloroquine.

Personally I think the major players, Fauci, Pharma CEO, NIH, FDA staff should be waterboarded until we get to the bottom.

buzzsawmonkey 1/11/2023 10:29:07 AM

8

Superhydroxychloroquine can cure coronavirus

This is such good news that it cannot but inspire us

Perhaps it even means that to wear masks they'll not require us

Superhydroxychloroquine can cure coronavirus!

Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle aye! Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle aye!

vxbush 1/11/2023 12:39:43 PM

9

Reply to buzzsawmonkey in 8:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Kosh's Shadow 1/11/2023 5:34:01 PM

10

Using my celll phone for data access (unlimited plan) while I get a dedicated cell data device set up

Landline went out a few days ago, but DSL still worked. So they came and fixed the phone (outside cable problem, no charge and they did not have to come into the house)

That was maybe noon. 6 PM, static on the line during calls, and then no line, and no DSL.

If this mobile device works, then I'm canceling DSL. With our existing cell plan, another data line unlimited is $10, cheaper and FASTER than DSL

Kosh's Shadow 1/11/2023 8:01:48 PM

11

Reply to Kosh's Shadow in 10:

Now I get an email telling me the ticket was resolved - but no service.

Kosh's Shadow 1/11/2023 8:17:43 PM

12

Reply to Kosh's Shadow in 11:

Obviously the service was fixed like a vet fixes a dog