The Daily Broadside

Fourth of July 2023

Posted on 07/04/2023 5.00 AM

JCM 7/1/2023 8:03:34 PM


Posted by: JCM

JCM 7/1/2023 8:04:51 PM
1
Occasional Reader 7/4/2023 7:10:04 AM
2


JCM 7/4/2023 9:41:48 AM
3

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Kosh's Shadow 7/4/2023 11:31:37 AM
4

Reply to JCM in 3:

WHat kind of White Supremacist trash is that? All "men" are created equal? What about all the other genders? And everyone must be juded by their RACE first!

--Any wokie dopie



buzzsawmonkey 7/4/2023 12:19:11 PM
5

Jukebox:  "God's Country," written by Yip Harburg and Harold Arlen, the team who did the songs for "The Wizard of Oz", sung here by Harold Arlen himself.

A song which deserves to be better known.

buzzsawmonkey 7/4/2023 12:26:37 PM
6

I always take the time to play "Ballad for Americans" on July 4th. 

"Ballad for Americans” is a 10-minute cantata, sung by Paul Robeson and a chorus, which loosely traces the US from independence to what was then the present day (it was first performed on radio in 1939 and commercially released in 1940).  I first heard it back in “Music Appreciation Class” in elementary school; it was popular back then, but is much less well-known today.

You can tell it was written by Leftists in that it exalts “the common man” pretty thoroughly (with mention for some of the big names in American history like Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, etc.  It also gives a nod to Haym Solomon, the Jew who was so instrumental in financing the Revolution.  It was, for its time, “multicultural,” in that it mentions slavery, and, at the end, political corruption, murders and lynchings—but it ends on a note of unity and optimism (“Our country’s strong, our country’s young/And the greatest songs are still unsung”).  It also has Robeson as the “voice of America.”  

It’s interesting to me for the combination of patriotism and Leftism; far more patriotic than today’s Left.  At the same time, you can sort of hear the roots of what today’s Left has become.  


Kosh's Shadow 7/4/2023 12:59:04 PM
7

I have given some thought to why the American Revolution did not result in the chaos common to most other revolutions. The reason is, it was not a reviolution against the system - the local governments, courts, police, continued to function. It was purely a revolution against the King's control of the system. Thus, thugs were not given free reign.

I've also read that countries the British colonized have had less trouble moving to local rule. India is a prime example. The Btitish model of self-government continued to be used; only the people at the top were replaced. Not so true for the French colonies.

buzzsawmonkey 7/4/2023 1:06:13 PM
8


In #7 Kosh's Shadow said: Thus, thugs were not given free reign.

I have read that several of the "militias"---the local volunteers who were not officially in the "Continental Army"---went somewhat rogue following independence, and tried to carve out private kingdoms for themselves, sometimes in unsettled but also in settled areas; they figured that since the British authority was over, and the new American government under the Articles of Confederation was weak, there was no reason they could not do so.  

This is why the Second Amendment begins with "A well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state"; it was a warning that rogue bands of armed men had to be "well-regulated"---i.e., suppressed---for a free state to be secure, and that the only way such "regulation" could be accomplished, especially in a nation which did not have any standing army to speak of, was if the citizenry was also thoroughly armed.

Occasional Reader 7/4/2023 2:52:09 PM
9

Reply to buzzsawmonkey in 8:

 bands of armed men had to be "well-regulated"---i.e., suppressed-”


No.  The term “well-regulated” in that context was understood to mean “well-drilled/trained”. 

Occasional Reader 7/4/2023 2:54:33 PM
10

Baltimore mass shooter is yet another “trans” (also, black, and BLM supporter):


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12264195/PICTURED-Cross-dressing-gunman-July-4-Philly-bloodbath-left-five-dead-BLM-supporter.html

Occasional Reader 7/4/2023 2:56:37 PM
11

Reply to Occasional Reader in 10:

*Philadelphia, not Baltimore

Kosh's Shadow 7/4/2023 3:13:24 PM
12

Biden likely violated First Amendment during COVID-19 pandemic, federal judge says

A U.S. District Court judge is temporarily preventing White House officials from meeting with tech companies about social media censorship, arguing that such actions in the past were likely First Amendment violations.

The injunction, which was obtained by Fox News, states that the government's actions "likely violate the Free Speech Clause" and that the court "is not persuaded by Defendants’ arguments," dealing a significant blow to the White House. 

"During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth,’" Doughty wrote.

"If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history," the injunction adds. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech."

buzzsawmonkey 7/4/2023 3:28:06 PM
13


In #9 Occasional Reader said: No.  The term “well-regulated” in that context was understood to mean “well-drilled/trained”. 

I know that is the current pro-Second Amendment argument, but I believe it is both historically wrong, in light of the rogue-militia incidents and insurrections during the early years of independence, and grammatically wrong, in that there are many instances of impromptu posses referring to themselves as "Regulators" when they suppressed what they considered threatening or bad behavior.


You must be logged in to comment.