|
-
vxbush
9/28/2023 5:43:36 AM
-
2
|
I watched this video yesterday, and while I would like to believe this is true, at least one of the websites linked didn't include any links to his research, didn't include any proof of his credentials, etc. So there's more research to do. However, with that said, he freely admits he supports Democrats but absolutely despises what Google is doing. 41 minutes long, so watch over a lunch. Needless, I will be doing more research. If he has the goods, he deserves to be supported.
|
|
|
|
|
-
Occasional Reader
9/28/2023 5:52:53 AM
-
6
|
Reply to vxbush in 3:
But only right-wingnuts believe in the Deep State.
|
|
|
-
JCM
9/28/2023 6:15:55 AM
-
8
|
Reply to vxbush in 1: My tin foil hat theory is Fetterman is unable to dress himself. Shorts and hoodies are easier for his handlers.
|
|
-
buzzsawmonkey
9/28/2023 6:25:22 AM
-
9
|
In #1 vxbush said: So the dress code in the Senate was dropped because the Schumer didn't want to force Fetterman to wear a suit, but then he was forced to adopt a new dress code by resolution. Heh. You lose, Schumer. The attempt to change the dress code was not merely an admission, but a declaration by the Democrats that Fetterman is unsuitable for the Senate.
|
|
-
JCM
9/28/2023 6:25:43 AM
-
10
|
Reply to vxbush in 3: Why not Fauci lied about everything else re: COVID.
|
|
|
-
vxbush
9/28/2023 7:28:09 AM
-
12
|
In #8 JCM said: My tin foil hat theory is Fetterman is unable to dress himself. Shorts and hoodies are easier for his handlers. In #9 buzzsawmonkey said: The attempt to change the dress code was not merely an admission, but a declaration by the Democrats that Fetterman is unsuitable for the Senate. Both sounds extremely plausible, so I expect the media to start denouncing suits any day now.
|
|
-
buzzsawmonkey
9/28/2023 7:52:24 AM
-
13
|
In #12 vxbush said: Both sounds extremely plausible, so I expect the media to start denouncing suits any day now. Well, it's a short step from Bloomberg's astroturf "No Labels" organization to a new "No Lapels" offshoot.
|
|
-
vxbush
9/28/2023 8:38:54 AM
-
14
|
In #13 buzzsawmonkey said: Well, it's a short step from Bloomberg's astroturf "No Labels" organization to a new "No Lapels" offshoot. Heh. From your brain to the leftist's, tout suite.
|
|
-
buzzsawmonkey
9/28/2023 10:10:59 AM
-
15
|
Reply to vxbush in 14: "Toot Sweets" would be a good name for an upscale confectioner's.
|
|
-
Kosh's Shadow
9/28/2023 7:10:55 PM
-
16
|
In #15 buzzsawmonkey said: "Toot Sweets" would be aood name for an upscale confectioner's Jukebox
|
|
You must be logged in to comment.